Brain Games- False Memory and Misinformation Effect

it looks like an red car went about 40 km an hr

1. I guessed it was a lower speed not because the interviewer used the word "bumped" but because the blue car barely moved. If the speed was higher, the blue car would have moved further or suffered more damage. 2. Isn't there a possibility that the people did picture a yield sign, but did not bother to point that out when asked if it was a stop sign? Sometimes someone will make a statement that is mostly correct, and people will agree because their thought process is just similar enough. They are both signs with a similar meaning. Maybe those being interviewed just thought he meant "Yield sign" or they thought the specific type of sign did not matter.

This is a great response to the Mandela Effect. Altered memories are is much reasonable to believe than cross dimension influence.

This is how the Mandella effect came to existence.

This is dumb… as its far more about guessing a speed , than some ones memory … soo bad . wow .. are people really this stupid.

wtf

lame

I guess 20 mph

4:04 it says "right after the accident" not before lol that bothered me

I hope this show is for kindergarten

Decent replication of the Loftus study setup, but they forgot the single most important take home point that makes the study important! The key finding comes from the fact that when she brought the people back to the lab one week later and asked them if they remembered seeing broken glass, the people who were asked how fast the cars were going when they "smashed" into each other reported seeing broken glass at the scene at double the rates of those who were asked how fast the cars were going when they "hit" each other. Thus, the key point is that we fill in details when reconstructing our memories (e.g., if they smash into each other, then there must have been broken glass) and those details often run counter to what we actually observed (i.e., there actually was no broken glass resulting from the accident).

I don't get y your all hating on this the whole idea is about persuasion and small cues effecting your memory and it has been proven to be true so until you can do better I really wouldn't be hating on it

0:39 the speeding car did not "T-bone" the parked car like was shown you after the accident – They hit side to side.
2:10 , 3:35 , 5:00 – the only parts of the entire video worth watching over and over again.

Got all of em right bitches

i guess i just suck at judging speed cuz i thought it was going way faster than it was regardless of how the question was presented

I passed

The black haired girl damn hot omg

More importantly you have to listen carefully to the question, what is being asked? Whether he said smashed or bumped is irrelevant. Those are subjective terms. I would have said 10 mph and in fact it is more accurate to the question. He asked how fast the car was going WHEN it came into contact with the other vehicle. The stop sign, I didn't see a stop sign.

The car was close to a standstill as it hit the other car. 🤦🏽 What are you guys talking about. 🤔

They measured the speed well before the impact. The car was decelerating/ BRAKING further till the impact. That’s a SIGNIFICANT difference!

ACAB

This is definitely not scripted

There can be many truths in Lies
There are no lies in Truth

But to your point …
Yes! in human psychology we are hard wired to be heavily influenced by what information we see first..
And also by what information "the crowd" seems to be accepting as truth.

This is why witnesses are separated and should be interviewed as early as possible after an event occurs.

Anyone knows the actual title of the Brain Games episode?

I got the first question right but not the second

the girl in purple got me S H O O K

Does anyone know the season and episode of this?

goodluck on your psyc tests!

All my life is a lie

psychology is so fun man i love this class

this is poggers

plot twist #3 everyone in this video is an actor and the whole thing is scripted

I got all of the questions right..?

2:08 almost

This video was eye-opening to the fact that we really cannot completely trust what we consider to be eyewitness accounts because they are flawed. TIH

I DID remember it was a yield sign actually so ha!

teach me to drift like this at 20 mph without ice please 😛

20 miles

Gus Fring cracks the Mandela Effect wide open

got the three right i would b the best witness

i mean, i was sure it was a yield sign and i guessed 20 miles so.. yeah idk about ur study

Which is exactly why police shouldn't be able to "legally LIE" in police inerviews. They use all kinds of psychological tricks to manipulate people into saying what they want to hear about who they already believe is guilty. They get trained for that sh*t yet people keep spewing that innocent people never confess or implicate themselves. Wouldn't it be nice if it was just that simple.😑