1. I guessed it was a lower speed not because the interviewer used the word "bumped" but because the blue car barely moved. If the speed was higher, the blue car would have moved further or suffered more damage. 2. Isn't there a possibility that the people did picture a yield sign, but did not bother to point that out when asked if it was a stop sign? Sometimes someone will make a statement that is mostly correct, and people will agree because their thought process is just similar enough. They are both signs with a similar meaning. Maybe those being interviewed just thought he meant "Yield sign" or they thought the specific type of sign did not matter.
Decent replication of the Loftus study setup, but they forgot the single most important take home point that makes the study important! The key finding comes from the fact that when she brought the people back to the lab one week later and asked them if they remembered seeing broken glass, the people who were asked how fast the cars were going when they "smashed" into each other reported seeing broken glass at the scene at double the rates of those who were asked how fast the cars were going when they "hit" each other. Thus, the key point is that we fill in details when reconstructing our memories (e.g., if they smash into each other, then there must have been broken glass) and those details often run counter to what we actually observed (i.e., there actually was no broken glass resulting from the accident).
I don't get y your all hating on this the whole idea is about persuasion and small cues effecting your memory and it has been proven to be true so until you can do better I really wouldn't be hating on it
0:39 the speeding car did not "T-bone" the parked car like was shown you after the accident – They hit side to side. 2:10 , 3:35 , 5:00 – the only parts of the entire video worth watching over and over again.
More importantly you have to listen carefully to the question, what is being asked? Whether he said smashed or bumped is irrelevant. Those are subjective terms. I would have said 10 mph and in fact it is more accurate to the question. He asked how fast the car was going WHEN it came into contact with the other vehicle. The stop sign, I didn't see a stop sign.
There can be many truths in Lies There are no lies in Truth
But to your point … Yes! in human psychology we are hard wired to be heavily influenced by what information we see first.. And also by what information "the crowd" seems to be accepting as truth.
This is why witnesses are separated and should be interviewed as early as possible after an event occurs.
4:54–5:08 sums it up on why there is so much cognitive dissonance among people of differing political parties, as with CoVid. To mask or not to vaccinate or not. Depending on whether perceive the information coming from a trusted source or not changes their memories, alters their behaviors, thoughts and attitudes. This was just a change in a word, imagine the sea of misinformation and multiple groups people have to navigate through? Mass manipulation at its finest.
4:54–5:08 sums it up on why there is so much cognitive dissonance among people of differing political parties, as with CoVid. To mask or not to vaccinate or not. Depending on whether perceive the information coming from a trusted source or not changes their memories, alters their behaviors, thoughts and attitudes. This was just a change in a word, imagine the sea of misinformation and multiple groups people have to navigate through? Mass manipulation at its finest.
@LeeLee-ml2yd
12.12.2023i mean, i was sure it was a yield sign and i guessed 20 miles so.. yeah idk about ur study
lex
05.08.2023got the three right i would b the best witness
Rhiannon
25.07.20231. I guessed it was a lower speed not because the interviewer used the word "bumped" but because the blue car barely moved. If the speed was higher, the blue car would have moved further or suffered more damage. 2. Isn't there a possibility that the people did picture a yield sign, but did not bother to point that out when asked if it was a stop sign? Sometimes someone will make a statement that is mostly correct, and people will agree because their thought process is just similar enough. They are both signs with a similar meaning. Maybe those being interviewed just thought he meant "Yield sign" or they thought the specific type of sign did not matter.
lc
04.10.2022Gus Fring cracks the Mandela Effect wide open
Kyle Jose
07.08.2022This is how the Mandella effect came to existence.
Nobleness Dee
07.08.2022This is dumb… as its far more about guessing a speed , than some ones memory … soo bad . wow .. are people really this stupid.
Leonel 7
07.08.2022wtf
Garrett Graf
07.08.2022lame
Shalini Samanta 10C
07.08.2022I guess 20 mph
Phalollipop
07.08.20224:04 it says "right after the accident" not before lol that bothered me
Natasha Hynes
07.08.2022I hope this show is for kindergarten
Steven Stemler
04.08.2022Decent replication of the Loftus study setup, but they forgot the single most important take home point that makes the study important! The key finding comes from the fact that when she brought the people back to the lab one week later and asked them if they remembered seeing broken glass, the people who were asked how fast the cars were going when they "smashed" into each other reported seeing broken glass at the scene at double the rates of those who were asked how fast the cars were going when they "hit" each other. Thus, the key point is that we fill in details when reconstructing our memories (e.g., if they smash into each other, then there must have been broken glass) and those details often run counter to what we actually observed (i.e., there actually was no broken glass resulting from the accident).
Jacob Jopson
04.08.2022I don't get y your all hating on this the whole idea is about persuasion and small cues effecting your memory and it has been proven to be true so until you can do better I really wouldn't be hating on it
Bill Pigg
04.08.20220:39 the speeding car did not "T-bone" the parked car like was shown you after the accident – They hit side to side.
2:10 , 3:35 , 5:00 – the only parts of the entire video worth watching over and over again.
Axel Potapoff
04.08.2022Got all of em right bitches
William Davis
04.08.2022i guess i just suck at judging speed cuz i thought it was going way faster than it was regardless of how the question was presented
RCPMusic
04.08.2022I passed
murugesh karthik
04.08.2022The black haired girl damn hot omg
dz1sfb
04.08.2022More importantly you have to listen carefully to the question, what is being asked? Whether he said smashed or bumped is irrelevant. Those are subjective terms. I would have said 10 mph and in fact it is more accurate to the question. He asked how fast the car was going WHEN it came into contact with the other vehicle. The stop sign, I didn't see a stop sign.
Stefan Grabe (SG)
04.08.2022The car was close to a standstill as it hit the other car. 🤦🏽 What are you guys talking about. 🤔
They measured the speed well before the impact. The car was decelerating/ BRAKING further till the impact. That’s a SIGNIFICANT difference!
Robeson G
04.08.2022ACAB
Black Zephyr
03.08.2022This is definitely not scripted
R. Lara-Moore
03.08.2022There can be many truths in Lies
There are no lies in Truth
But to your point …
Yes! in human psychology we are hard wired to be heavily influenced by what information we see first..
And also by what information "the crowd" seems to be accepting as truth.
This is why witnesses are separated and should be interviewed as early as possible after an event occurs.
AlexCC97
03.08.2022Anyone knows the actual title of the Brain Games episode?
KaiKai19💜
03.08.2022I got the first question right but not the second
hanfeezy
03.08.2022the girl in purple got me S H O O K
Alejandro Flores
03.08.2022Does anyone know the season and episode of this?
goodness
03.08.2022goodluck on your psyc tests!
Ali Abdal
03.08.2022All my life is a lie
dead hoe
03.08.2022psychology is so fun man i love this class
ASMR bruh
03.08.2022this is poggers
Victor Brooks
02.08.2022Are yall saying disagreeing with this video becuase you don't want it to be true to preserve a sense that we are in fact correct and not wrong?
Victor Brooks
02.08.2022Are yall saying disagreeing with this video becuase you don't want it to be true to preserve a sense that we are in fact correct and not wrong?
L K
02.08.2022plot twist #3 everyone in this video is an actor and the whole thing is scripted
L K
02.08.2022plot twist #3 everyone in this video is an actor and the whole thing is scripted
Mia Charlotte
02.08.2022I got all of the questions right..?
Mia Charlotte
02.08.2022I got all of the questions right..?
Asher Skylark
02.08.20222:08 almost
Asher Skylark
02.08.20222:08 almost
meshahart1
02.08.2022This video was eye-opening to the fact that we really cannot completely trust what we consider to be eyewitness accounts because they are flawed. TIH
meshahart1
02.08.2022This video was eye-opening to the fact that we really cannot completely trust what we consider to be eyewitness accounts because they are flawed. TIH
Gwen S
02.08.2022I DID remember it was a yield sign actually so ha!
Gwen S
02.08.2022I DID remember it was a yield sign actually so ha!
Ricardo Caiano
02.08.2022teach me to drift like this at 20 mph without ice please 😛
Ricardo Caiano
02.08.2022teach me to drift like this at 20 mph without ice please 😛
Yaxha Cruz
02.08.202220 miles
Yaxha Cruz
02.08.202220 miles
Seasons of Time
02.08.20224:54–5:08 sums it up on why there is so much cognitive dissonance among people of differing political parties, as with CoVid. To mask or not to vaccinate or not. Depending on whether perceive the information coming from a trusted source or not changes their memories, alters their behaviors, thoughts and attitudes. This was just a change in a word, imagine the sea of misinformation and multiple groups people have to navigate through? Mass manipulation at its finest.
Seasons of Time
02.08.20224:54–5:08 sums it up on why there is so much cognitive dissonance among people of differing political parties, as with CoVid. To mask or not to vaccinate or not. Depending on whether perceive the information coming from a trusted source or not changes their memories, alters their behaviors, thoughts and attitudes. This was just a change in a word, imagine the sea of misinformation and multiple groups people have to navigate through? Mass manipulation at its finest.
lc
02.08.2022Gus Fring cracks the Mandela Effect wide open